39 Wash. App. 229 - State v. Casto’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Anthony v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of an informant who has stated that incriminating material can be found in a particular place and the materials are then found, it should also suffice that the informant stated that a purchase may be made from a certain person and place and the purchase is in fact made thereafter. Steenerson, 38 Wn. App. at 726 ; . . .. (Footnote and citations omitted.) State v. Casto, 39 Wn. App. 229, 234-35 , 692 P.2d 890 (1984), review denied, 103 Wn.2d 1020 (1985). See also People v. Wares, 129 Mich. App. 136 , 341 N.W.2d 256, 259 (1983) (properly controlled buy may be the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an informant claiming to know that drugs are for sale at a particular place is given marked money, searched for drugs, and observed while sent into the specified location. If the informant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.