39 Wash. App. 530 - State v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2004
3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Payton v. New York · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · New York v. Belton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) cases in which the Court merely applied settled precedents to new and different factual situations, (2) cases in which the Court declared a rule of criminal procedure to be a "clear break with the past", and (3) cases in which the Court ruled that the trial court lacked authority to convict or punish the criminal defendant in the first instance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“1. The purpose to be served by the new standards; 2. The extent of reliance by law enforcement officials on the old standards; 3. The effect on the administration of justice of a retroactive application of the new standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“investigation, and possible retrial, of these cases would be difficult and time consuming.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.