39 Wash. App. 849 - State v. Crandall’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2005
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Michigan v. Long · Smith v. Maryland · Oliver v. United States · Ryan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“invoking its protection must claim state invasion of a justifiable, reasonable, or a legitimate expectation of privacy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he question whether [a search] violates Const, art. 1, § 7 is not answered by looking to the nature of the property viewed, alone. This is but one factor in determining whether the [search] has unconstitutionally intruded into a person’s “private affairs.” We also reject the analysis which rests solely on the legitimacy of a defendant’s subjective expectations of privacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.