Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 39 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Leonard

39 Wis. 2d 461 - State v. Leonard’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2014 · most notably North Carolina v. Pearce (1969), 46 Wis. 2d 93 - Hayes v. States (1970)

38 state decisions

130196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · United States v. Jackson · Stroud v. United States · 60 Cal. 2d 482 - People v. Henderson · Patton v. State of North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hereafter, on resentencing following a second conviction after retrial, or mere resentencing, the trial court shall be barred from imposing an increased sentence unless (1) events occur or come to the sentencing court's attention subsequent to the first imposition of sentence which warrant an increased penalty; and (2) the court affirmatively states its grounds in the record for increasing the sentence.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]ix justices believe that until the United States Supreme Court has spoken unequivocally on this issue the approach of Marano [v. United States, 374 F.2d 583 (1st Cir. 1967)] is correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e see no good reason for distinguishing those cases [in which the conviction was invalid] from situations involving only resentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.