39 Wis. 2d 536 - Hailey v. Zacharias’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2007
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berliner v. Town of Waterloo · Lange v. Kennedy · Pennefeather v. City of Kenosha · McBride v. Wright · State ex rel. Fuller v. Circuit Court for Waukesha County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““281.03 Lis pendens; who may file; effect; when void; discharge. (1) In an action where the complaint contains a legal description of real estate and seeks relief in respect to the title thereto, after the filing of the complaint the plaintiff shall file in the office of the register of deeds of each county where any part thereof is situated, a lis pendens containing the names of the parties, the object of the action and a description of the land in that county affected thereby. In any action if the defendant asks relief on a counterclaim or cross-complaint, which contains a legal description of real estate and seeks relief in respect to the title thereto, after the filing of the counterclaim or cross-complaint he shall file a lis pendens. From the time of such filing every purchaser or encumbrancer whose conveyance or encumbrance is not recorded or filed shall be deemed a subsequent purchaser or encumbrancer and shall be bound by the proceedings in the action to the same extent and in the same manner as if he were a party thereto. In any such action in which a lis pendens has been filed, if the party filing the same shall fail for one year after the filing thereof to serve and file proof of service of the summons or the counterclaim or cross-complaint of one or more of the adverse parties, said notice shall be void, and upon motion and proof of the court may order such notice struck from the files. Judgment shall not be entered in favor of the party required to file lis pend”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is a legal notice to any such person not having knowledge of the proceedings at the time his interest was procured or derived. As to the parties to the action... who appear and participate in the proceedings, the lis pendens serves no real purpose and actually has no application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]s to par ties to the action. . .who appear and participate in the proceedings, the lis pendens serves no real purpose and actually has no application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gaugert v. Duve
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.