State v. Chattley’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2008 · most notably Texas v. Brown (1983), State v. Johnson (2002)
1 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Adams v. Williams · Harris v. United States · United States v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a party has knowledge of facts, or could with due diligence ascertain facts, bearing ón a juror’s qualifications to serve on a jury but fails to apprise the court of those facts within such a time as to allow it to correct any possible error, the party waives any rights subsequently to raise that objection.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kelly · State v. Nielson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.