In Re Paley’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on United States v. Estus · Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. · Deans v. O'Donnell · Education Assistance Corp. v. Zellner · In Re Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) ... [T]he court shall confirm a plan if— (3)the plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law; ... (7)the action of the debtor in filing the petition was in good faith. 43”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Dugan“Satisfaction of § 1325(b) does not displace the good faith analysis required under § 1325(a)(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.