Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 F.2d 585 - Eason v. Dickson

Eason v. Dickson’s Empirical Analysis

390 F.2d 585 · 1968

Citation profile

87
cited by 87 later decisions
8
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Richerson v. Jones (1977), Cape May Greene, Inc. v. Warren (1983)

59 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

580196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Mempa v. Rhay · Ex parte Poresky · Phillips v. United States · Ex parte Bransford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The federal courts have already found that the California provisions for parole revocation do not present a substantial federal constitutional question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.