Stein v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
390 F.2d 625 · 1968
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably United States v. Currie (1979), Bearden v. United States (1968)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sanders v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. · Green v. United States · Skibs A/S Jolund v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * [T]he moving party [must show] * * * by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) the testimony was perjured; and (2) the prosecuting officials knowingly and intentionally used such testimony to secure a conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.