Johnson v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
390 F.3d 1067 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably Randall v. Astrue (2009), Scott ex rel. Scott v. Astrue (2008)
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. Zebley · Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Clark v. Apfel · Dixon v. Barnhart · Nguyen v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“12.05 Mental Retardation: Mental retardation refers to significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning initially manifested during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22. The required level of severity for this disorder is met when the requirements in A, B, C, or D are satisfied. * * * C. A valid verbal, performance, or full scale IQ of 60 through 70 and a physical or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The mere fact that some evidence may support a conclusion opposite to that reached by the Commissioner,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Swink v. Saul“does not allow this Court to reverse the decision of the ALJ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Swink v. Saul
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.