Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 F.3d 1088 - Brock v. Seling

Brock v. Seling’s Empirical Analysis

390 F.3d 1088 · 2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2021

6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

70200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Kansas v. Hendricks · Granberry v. Greer · Kansas v. Crane · Bolker v. Commissioner · Clark v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether predicated on expert testimony that Brock suffered from a paraphilia that rendered him unable to control his desire to rape or testimony suggesting an antisocial personality marked by im-pulsivity, or both, the jury undoubtedly found that Brock’s condition evinced “serious difficulty” in controlling behavior. This is sufficient. Crane declined to require that the condition posing serious difficulty be a volitional one.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'some combination of mental abnormality and personality disorder which in conjunction make him likely to engage in predatory acts of sexual violence'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.