Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 F.3d 542 - Amdocs Limited Securities Litigation Lp v. Amdocs K a

Amdocs Limited Securities Litigation Lp v. Amdocs K a’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2022

1 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

140200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Parnes · Florida State Board of Administration v. Green Tree Financial Corp. · Fusco v. Xerox Corp. · In Re Vantive Corporation Securities Litigation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[a]lleged misrepresentations and omissions can be immaterial as a matter of law if they: 1) are of such common knowledge that a reasonable investor can be presumed to understand them; 2) present or conceal such insignificant data that, in the total mix of information, it simply would not matter; 3) are so vague and of such obvious hyperbole that no reasonable investor would rely upon them; or 4) are accompanied by sufficient cautionary statements."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “would have been false or misleading at the several points in time in which it is alleged they were made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.