Mansour v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
390 F.3d 667 · 2004
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 166 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Wakkary v. Holder (2009), Lolong v. Gonzales (2007)
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft · Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 166 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the infliction of suffering or harm upon those who differ (in race, religion or political opinion) in a way regarded as offensive,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kohli v. Gonzales“obliged under international treaty law to refrain from acts which would defeat the objectives and purpose of the Convention”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kohli v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.