Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 F. App'x 210

Walker v. Fouche

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2012

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Michelle Walker appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Walker v. Fouche, No. 3:10-cv-00179-JFA, 2010 WL 1463456 (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/390/fappx/210 · .json · Public domain