Woltz v. Bailey

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-04

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2011

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *224U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. Bailey, No. 3:09-ev-00211-GCM, 2009 WL 1564142 (W.D.N.C. June 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.