Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 F. App'x 266

Everett v. Francis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 9, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-08-09

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2011

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-08-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Terry Lynn Everett appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Everett v. Francis, No. 5:07-cv-00135-FPS-JES, 2010 WL 1490479 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/390/fappx/266 · .json · Public domain