← 390 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Powell v. Castaneda

390 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Powell v. Castaneda’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

cited by 20 later decisions

July 2019

most recently cited

19 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“adverse effect” requires more. [The plaintiff] does not allege that he suffered physical or mental harm or injury as a result of these violations. Thus, [the plaintiff] has not pled any “adverse effect” resulting from the Army’s alleged violations of [the Privacy Act]. Foncello, 2005 WL 2994011 , at (D.Conn. Nov. 7, 2005). 9 . Moreover, Plaintiff's Complaint has been dismissed twice for failure to provide a "short and plain statement of the claim” pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). In directing the Plaintiff to file a less detailed pleading, the Court observed that "the [initial] complaint is a discursive account containing a mass of detail more appropriate for trial ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 689 F. Supp. 2d 141 - Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence Agency

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.