Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 Ill. 205 - Corwin v. Rheims

Corwin v. Rheims’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 1990 · most notably 31 Ill. App. 3d 542 - Rickard v. Pozdal (1975), 22 Ill. App. 3d 40 - City of DeKalb v. Anderson (1974)

28 state decisions

100194519501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Doctor v. . Hughes · Hannah Fitchie v. Cecil Brown O · Howe v. Hodge · Arnold v. Alden · Madison v. Larmon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) If a party who has an appealable interest in a judgment or decree files a motion to vacate such judgment or decree, he may thereafter abandon the motion by withdrawing it or if he files a notice of appeal, such filing will constitute an abandonment of the motion. In either event the judgment or decree becomes final on the date it was entered and the time within which a notice of appeal must be filed begins to run from that date. (2) If a party in interest in any judgment or decree which is final and appealable files a motion to vacate or set aside the same, the motion stays the running of the time within which the notice of appeal must be filed, and if the motion is disposed of on its merits during the thirty-day period or thereafter, the time for filing of a notice of appeal begins to run from the date such motion is disposed of.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.