Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 N.W.2d 547 - Stroschein v. Stroschein

Stroschein v. Stroschein’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lucke v. Lucke · Brodersen v. Brodersen · Hugret v. Hugret

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must be considered a proceeding separate from the original action and the fact that the judge sought to be disqualified made any ruling in the original action does not bar a demand for a change of judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “must file a timely request before that judge has ruled upon any matter pertaining to the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.