Hall v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1967
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Jackson · Nuckolls v. Nuckolls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The granting or refusing of a continuance is a matter of discretion with the trial court, and, unless it appears that such discretion was abused to the prejudice of the substantial rights of a litigant, the action of the court will not be disturbed upon appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burford v. Stuart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.