Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 Pa. Super. 76 - Commonwealth v. Walker

390 Pa. Super. 76 - Commonwealth v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably State v. Coleman (1997), 2007 Pa. Super. 230 - Commonwealth v. Robinson (2007)

25 state decisions

1301989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Benton v. Maryland · United States v. DiFrancesco · Alabama v. Smith · Kahn v. Grant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhenever a judge imposes a more severe sentence upon a defendant after a new trial, the reasons for ... doing so must affirmatively appear. Those reasons must be based upon objective information concerning identifiable conduct on the part of the defendant occurring after the time of the original sentencing proceeding. And the factual data upon which the increased sentence is based must be made part of the record, so that the constitutional legitimacy of the increased sentence may be fully reviewed on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “by filing a petition for collateral relief, [Appellants] assumed the risk that [their] sentencing on the various counts would be adjusted insofar as was necessary to preserve the integrity of the original sentencing scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.