Farmer v. Com.’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schmerber v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Holt v. United States · South Dakota v. Neville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of prior DUI convictions is necessary to prove the substantive offense of driving under the influence as a third or subsequent offense, and therefore, is admissible during the guilt stage of a bifurcated trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that proof of such charge requires proof of prior DUI convictions. For these reasons, the trial court did not err in admitting evidence of Farmer's prior DUI convictions independent of his prior traffic record during the guilt stage of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that evidence of prior DUI convictions does not constitute the `traffic record' as contemplated by Code § 46.2-943 where the offense charged under Code § 18.2-266 is a subsequent offense of DUI punishable under Code § 18.2-270.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.