Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 So. 2d 118

Wright v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1980

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-11-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1981

1 state decisions

Relies on Dade County v. Baker · State v. Carroll

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-11-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The question on this appeal is whether a person of eleven years, ten months and twenty-one days of age falls within the statutory classification of “eleven years of age or younger.” See Section 794.011(2). We answer in the negative and therefore reverse.

¶2Thomas James Wright was convicted of committing a sexual battery upon a person of eleven years of age or younger in violation of Section 794.011(2), Florida Statutes (1977). The victim was eleven years, ten months and twenty-one days of age on the date of the offense and thus the defendant consistently argued throughout the proceedings below, that the victim was older than the statutory requirement of eleven years of age. We agree.

¶3The trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in State v. Carroll, 378 So.2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 385 So.2d 761 (Fla.1980) in which we held that the term “eleven years of age or younger” encompasses the time between a person’s birth and their eleventh birthday. Inasmuch as the victim in this case had passed her eleventh birthday, defendant’s conviction and sentence must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶4REVERSED and REMANDED.

LETTS, C. J., and GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
/390/so2d/118 · .json · Public domain