¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief for the reason that the motion is legally insufficient on its face. Appellant’s allegations concerning errors in a pre-sentence investigation report did not meet the standard of specificity required by Wood v. State, 375 So.2d 10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
¶2AFFIRMED.