Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

390 So. 2d 32

Howard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 28, 1980

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1980-10-28

Relies on 41 Ala. App. 173 - City of Birmingham v. Perry · Opinion of the Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-10-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 456 So. 2d 1156 - Reeves v. State (1984), 426 So. 2d 497 - Sanders v. State (1982)

38 state decisions

3201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BOWEN, Judge.

¶1The petitioner, an inmate of the Draper Correctional Center in Elmore County, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus alleging that his sentence of sixteen years’ imprisonment for a conviction under an indictment charging the unlawful sale of marijuana is excessive and illegal in that it exceeds the statutory limitations.

¶2Habeas corpus is the proper writ in which to raise the court’s excess of jurisdiction. Alabama Code 1975, Section 15-21-24.

¶3Alabama Code 1975, Section 20-2-70 provides a sentence of imprisonment of “not less than two nor more than fifteen years” for the sale of marijuana, the crime charged against the defendant. Plainly, the sentence of sixteen years’ imprisonment is illegal, and excessive in that it exceeds the sentence authorized by statute. The sentence imposed following conviction of a crime must conform to the statute and cannot exceed the term prescribed by law. Opinion of Clerk, Supreme Court, 347 So.2d 524 (Ala.1977); City of Birmingham v. Perry, 41 Ala.App. 173, 125 So.2d 279 (1960).

¶4The judgment of the Circuit Court of Mobile County is hereby reversed and the cause is remanded. The Circuit Court is instructed and directed to vacate the void sixteen year sentence and to resentence the defendant within the limitations of Section 20-2-70 and according to the law of this State.

¶5REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All Judges concur.
/390/so2d/32 · .json · Public domain