Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 SO2D 332 - Mines v. State

Mines v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably Barclay v. Florida (1983), 125 Ill. 2d 50 - People v. Evans (1988)

30 state decisions

1901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Proffitt v. Florida · 346 So. 2d 998 - Elledge v. State · 376 So. 2d 1149 - Lucas v. State · 368 So. 2d 1278 - Menendez v. State · 332 So. 2d 615 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court is reasonably convinced from the evidence that at the time of Susan Martin's murder Daniel Perez was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance. However, the mental or emotional disturbance Perez suffered from is one of the most dangerous types. The most significant and disturbing components of Perez's bipolar disorder is the antisocial and borderline personality features. The indifference to hurting others and the willingness to violate the rights of others to get what one wants are a deadly combination.... ... There was no evidence presented in this case that Daniel Perez is not able to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. Thus, while the Court finds that the mitigating circumstance of Daniel Perez participating in a murder while he was under extreme mental or emotional disturbance has been adequately proven, the Court gives little weight to this mitigating circumstance because there is no showing that Perez is unable to conform his behavior to the requirements of law and because the antisocial personality and borderline personality features of Perez's bipolar disorder make him dangerous.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(b) The capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The physical condition of the body . . . the conduct and admission of the appellant were sufficient to establish . . . the underlying felony of kidnapping.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.