390 So. 2d 383 - Amazon v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Royal Typewriter Company Division of Litton Business Systems Inc v. Xerographic Supplies Corporation (1983), Thor Bear, Inc. v. Crocker Mizner Park (1995)
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark · 114 So. 2d 645 - Alepgo Corporation v. Pozin · Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc. · 256 So. 2d 386 - Automobile Sales, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance Company · Margolis v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, the issue of fraud is not a proper subject of a summary judgment since it is a subtle thing requiring a full explanation of the facts and circumstances of the alleged wrong to determine if they collectively constitute a fraud.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) a false statement concerning a specific material fact; (2) the representor's knowledge that the representation is false; (3) an intention that the representation induce another to act on it; (4) consequent injury by the other party acting in reliance on the representation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Since the whole context is necessary for the determination, it is seldom that one can determine the presence or absence of fraud without trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.