¶1We affirm the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury regarding a statute not brought into issue by the evidence: Testimony established that the vehicle in question was stopped for traffic, rather than for the pedestrian (plaintiff). But see § 316.-130, Fla.Stat. (1977).
¶2We similarly affirm the court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict. See Stresscon International, Inc. v. Helms, 390 So.2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
¶3Affirmed.