390 So. 2d 847 - State v. Culberth’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith (1983), State v. Narcisse (1983)
6 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Proffitt v. Florida · Godfrey v. Georgia · State v. Sonnier · State v. English
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(a) whether the sentence was imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factors, and (b) whether the evidence supports the jury's finding of a statutory aggravating circumstance, and (c) whether the sentence is disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases, considering both the crime and the defendant." Supreme Court Rule 28, § 1.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“especially heinous, atrocious or cruel manner.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Narcisse · State v. Tassin“knowingly created a risk of death or great bodily harm to more than one person.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.