Hernandez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Penry v. Lynaugh · Estelle v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“refers to a tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis-commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one. Id. In determining whether probative value of evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, we consider”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lamerand v. State“(1) the probative value of the evidence; (2) the potential to impress the jury in some irrational, yet indelible, way; (3) the time needed to develop the evidence; and (4) the proponent's need for the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lamerand v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.