Marchetti v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
1,571 federal appellate · 191 district · 526 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3,150 later decisions (123 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), Flast v. Cohen (1968)
1,571 federal appellate · 191 district · 526 state decisions — followed in 40 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedUnited States v. Costello (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Hoffman v. United States · Carnley v. Cochran
Cited together with Grosso v. United States · Leary v. United States · Haynes v. United States · United States v. United States Coin & Currency · United State v. Kahriger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“confronted by substantial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination.”
100 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““1. Do not the federal wagering tax statutes here involved violate the petitioner’s privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment? Should not this court, especially in view of its recent decision in Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U.S. 70 , 86 S.Ct. 194 , 15 L.Ed.2d 165 (1965), overrule United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 , 73 S.Ct. 510 , 97 L.Ed. 754 (1953) and Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 419 , 75 S.Ct. 415 , 99 L.Ed. 475 (1955) ?””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“between an obligation to maintain records for inspection, and such an obligation supplemented by a requirement that those records be filed periodically with officers of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re MH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.