Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 390 U.S. 727 - St. Amant v. Thompson

St. Amant v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

3,837
cited by 3,837 later decisions
55
cited 55 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

770 federal appellate · 298 district · 1,894 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,837 later decisions (55 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois (1968), Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)

770 federal appellate · 298 district · 1,894 state decisions — followed in 46 states

1.2k01968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Garrison v. State of Louisiana · Rosenblatt v. Baer

Cited together with New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Garrison v. State of Louisiana · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,837 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]eckless conduct is not measured by whether a reasonably prudent man would have published, or would have investigated before publishing. There must be sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendant in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his publication. Publishing with such doubts shows reckless disregard for truth or falsity and demonstrates actual malice.”
    405 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Criticism of those responsible for government operations must be free, lest criticism of government itself be penalized. It is clear, therefore, that the "public official" designation applies at the very least to those among the hierarchy of government employees who have, or appear to the public to have, substantial responsibility for or control over the conduct of governmental affairs.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “St. Amant made his broadcast in June, 1962. He had known Albin since October 1961, when he first met with members of the dissident Teamsters faction. St. Am-ant testified that he had verified other aspects of Albin’s information and that he had affidavits from others. Moreover, Albin swore to his answers, first in writing and later in the presence of newsmen. According to Albin, he was prepared to substantiate his charges. St. Amant knew that Albin was engaged in an internal struggle in the union; Albin seemed to St. Amant to be placing himself in personal danger by publicly airing the details of the dispute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.