Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
391 F.2d 543 · 1968
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
July 1974
most recently cited
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on Graves v. United States · United States v. Hoffman · Dina Manufacturing Co. v. Segal · Whitney v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * the criminal intent is an essential element of the offense proscribed by Section 462(a). This principle was firmly settled in United States v. Hoffman, 137 F.2d 416, 419 (2d Cir. 1943) and has been consistently recognized and applied. See, e. g., Silverman v. United States, 220 F.2d 36, 39-40 (8th Cir. 1955); Graves v. United States, 252 F.2d 878, 881-882 (9th Cir. 1958); Whitney v. United States, 328 F.2d 888, 889 (5th Cir. 1964).” 1 Smith v. United States, 391 F.2d 543, 545 (8th Cir. 1968).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.