Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 F.2d 657 - Itasca Lodge 2029 v. Railway Express Agency Incorporated

Itasca Lodge 2029 v. Railway Express Agency Incorporated’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2015

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

80196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Elgin Ry Co v. Burley · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad · New Yorker Magazine, Inc. v. Gerosa · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The first [major dispute] relates to disputes over the formation of collective agreements or efforts to secure them. They arise where there is no such agreement or where it is sought to change the terms of one, and therefore the issue is not whether an existing agreement controls the controversy. They look to the acquisition of rights for the future, not to assertion of rights claimed to have vested in the past. The second class [minor dispute], however, contemplates the existence of a collective agreement already concluded or, at any rate, a situation in which no effort is made to bring about a formal change in terms or to create a new one. The dispute relates either to the meaning or proper application of a particular provision with reference to a specific situation or to an omitted case. In the latter event the claim is founded upon some incident of the employment relation, or asserted one, independent of those covered by the collective agreement, e. g., claims on account of personal injuries. In either case the claim is to rights accrued, not merely to have new ones created for the future. In general the difference is between what are regarded traditionally as the major and the minor disputes of the railway labor world. The former present the large issues about which strikes ordinarily arise with the consequent interruptions of traffic the Act sought to avoid. Because they more often involve those consequences and because they seek to create rather than to enforce contrac”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “represent” Evans. Local 2747 is the exclusive bargaining representative for its members, and Evans alleges only a breach of the duty of fair representation against officers and employees of Local 2747. 5 . The Board found that the 1984 and 1988 collective bargaining agreements were properly interpreted, and that Evans was not entitled to a refund of medical expenses for past or future medical care at an intermediate health care facility- 6 .Disputes concerning the interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement are considered “minor” under the RLA. The RLA "commands that the parties attempt to settle all 'minor disputes,’ first through their grievance procedure and if that fails by compulsory arbitration”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “No restraining order or injunctive relief shall be granted to any complainant who has failed to comply with any obligation imposed by law which is involved in the labor dispute in question, or who has failed to make every reasonable effort to settle such dispute either by negotiation or with the aid of any available governmental machinery of mediation or voluntary arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.