Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

391 F.2d 926

Docket No. 24938.

Conner v. United States

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

April 5, 1968, Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1968.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-04-05

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1969

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on McFarland v. United States · Rua v. United States · Caster v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Dennis Baker, Batesville, Miss., for appellant.

H. M. Ray, U.S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.

Before GEWIN and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUGHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 2312 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. Accordingly, he was adjudged to be guilty and sentence was imposed. He was represented by court appointed counsel during his trial.

¶2

On this appeal it is contended that error was committed in permitting an incriminating statement made to an F.B.I. Agent to be admitted into evidence and in failing to grant a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. It is further claimed that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.

¶3

The record in this case shows no error. Quite to the contrary the record amply supports the verdict and judgment and clearly demonstrates that the appellant received a fair trial. Battles v. United States, 388 F.2d 799 (5 Cir. 1968-- No. 24743); Stephens v. United States, 354 F.2d 999 (5 Cir. 1965); Garrison v. United States, 353 F.2d 94 (10 Cir. 1965); Rua v. United States, 321 F.2d 140 (5 Cir. 1963); Caster v. United States, 319 F.2d 850 (5 Cir. 1963); McFarland v. United States, 273 F.2d 417 (5 Cir. 1960).

¶4

The judgment is affirmed.

/391/f2d/926 · .json · Public domain