Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

391 F.2d 933

Docket No. 18121.

Samuel Ed Robinson v. C. Murray Henderson

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-04-10

2 counsel of record

Relies on 268 F. Supp. 349 - Robinson v. Henderson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-04-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1986

5 federal appellate ·

30196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

James D. Robinson and Josiah Baker, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant on brief.

Robert H. Dedman, Sp. Counsel, State of Tennessee, Nashville, Tenn., David W. McMackin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Tenn., George F. McCanless, Atty. Gen. and Reporter, State of Tennessee, of counsel, for appellee on brief.

Before PHILLIPS, CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

¶1

Appellant was convicted in the State Criminal Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee, under a three-count indictment charging assault with the intent to commit murder. He is now serving his sentence in the Tennessee State Penitentiary. Earlier he had been convicted in the City Court at Chattanooga, Tennessee, of three offenses of assault and battery and was fined $50 for each offense. The convictions in the State Court and City Court arose out of the same occurrences.

¶2

This habeas corpus action is based on the contention that the conviction in the State Court constituted double jeopardy and violated constitutional rights of appellant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. This appeal is from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Southern Division, denying the application for writ of habeas corpus.

¶3

Upon consideration, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is affirmed upon the opinion of District Judge Frank W. Wilson, reported at 268 F.Supp. 349.

/391/f2d/933 · .json · Public domain