Sd Dickson v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
11 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Carson P. ex rel Foreman v. Heineman (2007), Semerzakis v. Commissioner of Social Services (2005)
11 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · United States v. Mead Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(r) Early and periodic screening diagnostic, and treatment services. The term “early and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services” means the following items and services: 5. Such other necessary health care, diagnostic services, treatment, and other measures described in subsection (a) of this section to correct or ameliorate defects and physical or mental illnesses and conditions discovered by the screening services, whether or not such services are covered by the State plan.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is precisely the sort of `rights-creating' language identified in Gonzaga "). 15 The second and third prongs of the Blessing test are also satisfied. The right to individualized payment determinations that reflect the unique circumstances of the parents and the special needs of their adopted child is a concrete and objective right, the enforcement of which does not "strain judicial competence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“review and determination definitively indicate whether it interprets a state plan or amendment to be in conformity with the [federal] statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.