Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 FSUPP3D 136 - Carrozza v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.

Carrozza v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2021
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · United States v. Zannino · Mesnick v. General Electric Co. · Medina-Munoz v. Rj Reynolds Tobacco Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “CVS knew [that the Levaquin] was defective, or at least had evidence that [the] product was defective for Mr. Carrozza and failed to warn.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Carrozza's product liability argument is so thinly briefed and difficult to comprehend that there is a strong argument for waiver.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is liable for the distribution of an unreasonable dangerous product to Plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.