State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Will v. United States · CPC International Inc. v. Dimmitt Agri Industries, Inc. · Carroll v. United States · United States v. Helstoski · United States v. Apex Distributing Company, Inc., Albert A. Finer, and James E. Halstead, United States of America v. Albert A. Finer and John E. Moeller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although it is possible to construe ‘suppressing’ as a generic term meaning any form of exclusion of evidence (see Section 1-02-02, N.D.C.C.), the use of the term in context of the Rules of Criminal Procedure leads us to the conclusion that the words ‘[a]n order ... suppressing evidence’ relate to a decision by a lower court granting a motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Rule 12, N.D.R.Crim.P.... ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ ⅜; ⅜: “[W]e hold that appeals by the State pursuant to Section 29-28-07(5) are limited to appeals from the granting of a motion to suppress under Rule 12(b)(3), N.D.R.Crim. P., and from the granting of a motion to return evidence under Rule 41(e), N.D.R.Crim.P.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Corona · State v. Counts““An appeal may be taken by the state from: * ⅜ * * * * “5. An order granting the return of property or suppressing evidence, or suppressing a confession or admission, when accompanied by a statement of the prosecuting attorney asserting that the appeal is not taken for purpose of delay and that the evidence is a substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding. The statement must be filed with the clerk of district court and a copy must accompany the notice of appeal.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Counts · State v. Simon“as a generic term meaning any form of exclusion of evidence (see Section 1-02-02, N.D.C.C.), the use of the term in context of the Rules of Criminal Procedure leads us to the conclusion that the words”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Corona
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.