State v. Clothier’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2019
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 68 Cal. 2d 389 - In Re Finley · State v. Reiman · State v. Reutter · 93 Wash. 2d 309 - State v. Rinier · State v. Clabaugh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] crime committed in another state may be considered a felony in South Dakota for the purposes of enhancing punishment only 'if the minimal elements of the prior crime are substantially similar to the minimum elements of a crime in this state.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“under the laws of this state or under the laws of the United States at the time of conviction of such prior offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“When an habitual offender information has been filed, after a finding of guilty on the principal offense, an admission or denial shall be made and, if necessary, an election on a jury trial shall be made on the habitual offender information. Any trial may be had to another jury, at the request of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bartlett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.