State v. Sauls’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 1997
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Howard · United States v. Thomas · State v. Houston · Moore v. Vanderloo · State v. Carey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. evidence from the jurors that consists only of objective facts as to what actually occurred in or out of the jury room bearing on misconduct; 2. that the acts or statements complained of exceeded tolerable bounds of jury deliberation; and 3. that the misconduct was calculated to, and with reasonable probability did, influence the verdict.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wyldes v. Hundley · Hagen v. DeNooy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.