Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 Pa. Super. 418 - Commonwealth v. Pigg

391 Pa. Super. 418 - Commonwealth v. Pigg’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 421 Pa. Super. 548 - Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's Club (1992), Buehl v. Vaughn (1999)

2 federal appellate · 61 state decisions

4401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney · Commonwealth v. Pierce · Streeter v. United States · City of Long Beach v. Southwest Aircraft Services, Inc. · McKnight v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Malice consists of a “wickedness of disposition, hardness of heart, cruelty, recklessness of consequences, and a mind regardless of social duty, although a particular person may not be intended to be injured. Commonwealth v. Drum, 58 Pa. 9, 15 (1868); see also Commonwealth v. Young, 494 Pa. 224 , 431 A.2d 230 (1981) ... [Moreover] malice may be found where the defendant consciously disregarded an unjustified and extremely high risk that his actions might cause serious bodily injury. Commonwealth v. Wanamaker, 298 Pa.Super. 283 , 444 A.2d 1176 (1982).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]t is rare for a death caused by vehicular incident to give rise to a conviction of third degree murder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Where a defendant challenges his conviction on appeal the test of sufficiency of evidence is whether, viewing all evidence admitted at trial, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom, in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the trier of fact could have found that each element of the offenses charged was supported by evidence and inferences sufficient in law to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.