Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 SO2D 1155 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 353 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Underwood · State v. Trahan · 357 So. 2d 1 - State v. Segers · 377 So. 2d 316 - State v. Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]efendant should have an opportunity to rebut the highly prejudicial allegation in the pre-sentence report that he had been involved in a succession of burglaries....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “failure of the trial court to fully articulate the reasons for the sentence,...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.