Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 SO2D 1159 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2019

21 state decisions

1101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · State v. Berry · People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior Court · Robinson v. United States · Hopper v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The general rule, governing all lawyers, prohibits testimony by attorneys who are engaged in the trial of the case, (Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 5-101(B), 102) except in isolated circumstances. Even stronger reasons weigh against testimony by a prosecutor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “frequently and diligently, at whatever seemed to be unduly disadvantageous to the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[b]ecause no prejudice has been shown, any error here was harmless.C.Cr.P. 921.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.