391 So. 2d 1243 - Olinde v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · Miller v. Thomas · 378 So. 2d 369 - Cheatham v. City of New Orleans · McKowen v. Gulf States Utilities Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.. The City must exercise more care in the installation of signs in areas where it is known underground cables exist. The record reflects the standard practice at the time of the accident was to give complete discretion to the workers who installed the sign. The risk of making contact with an underground cable is a serious one, therefore it is simply not reasonable to allow this much discretion to laborers who have no training in the area of electricity. Olinde v. State of Louisiana et al, 391 So.2d 1243 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.