Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 SO2D 147 - Howton v. State

Howton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2009

20 state decisions

130198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Havens · Stroud v. United States · 29 Ala. App. 349 - Wilkins v. State · Gassenheimer v. State · Lee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The best evidence rule requires a party who wishes to prove the terms or contents of a writing to introduce the original into evidence if available.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence of collateral acts or offenses similar to the offense with which the accused is charged is admissible to prove his intent on the occasion in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.