Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 So. 2d 151 - Noe v. State

391 So. 2d 151 - Noe v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2000

14 state decisions

90198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Barker v. Wingo · Pollard v. United States · Bozza v. United States · Moore v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled that the passage of time alone will not bar imposition of a sentence or require an accused's discharge. In order to assert that speedy trial was denied, the delay must be purposeful or oppressive. [citation omitted] Whether the delay amounts to a deprivation of an accused's right to a speedy trial depends upon the circumstances of the particular case."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"As the Supreme Court of the United States recognized in Bozza v. United States, 330 U.S. 160 , 67 S.Ct. 645 , 91 L.Ed. 818 [1947]: "`This Court has rejected the "doctrine that a prisoner, whose guilt is established by a regular verdict, is to escape punishment altogether because the court committed an error in passing the sentence." ... The constitution does not require that sentencing should be a game in which a wrong move by the judge means immunity for the prisoner.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"Among the factors to be considered in determining whether there has been a denial of a speedy trial are length of delay, reason for delay, defendant's assertion of the right, and prejudice to the defendant."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.