Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 391 SO2D 165 - Florida Bar

Florida Bar’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably 482 So. 2d 486 - Cordis Corp. v. Prooslin (1986), 923 So. 2d 363 - Wilson v. Salamon (2005)

26 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · McDaniel v. McElvy · Avila South Condominium Ass'n v. Kappa Corp. · 335 So. 2d 802 - Carter v. Sparkman · Elmex Corp. v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Fort Lauderdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “: A pleading seeking an injunction or temporary restraining order must still be filed before either can be entered. The paradox derives from Rule 1.100. That Rule distinguishes between”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “service of process. It is based on the long-standing principle in service by publication that pleading the basis for service is sufficient if it is done in the language of the statute. See McDaniel v. McElvy, 91 Fla. 770 , 108 So. 820 (1926). Confusion has been generated in the decisions under the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “All rules and statutes in conflict with the following rules are hereby superseded as of their effective date, and any statute not superseded shall remain in effect as a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.