Rabideau v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2014
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Relies on 371 So. 2d 1010 - Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty. · Hubsch v. United States · Boggs v. Butler Boggs v. Whittle · King v. United States · 78 F. Supp. 35 - Long v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An employee’s conduct is within the scope of his employment only if it is the kind he is employed to perform, it occurs substantially within the time and space limits of the employment and it was activated at least in part by a purpose to serve the master.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he state ... shall be liable for tort claims in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“acting within the scope of his office or employment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.