State v. Ogden’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
55 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 775 So. 2d 1022 - State v. Casey (2000), 408 So. 2d 1280 - State v. Johnson (1982)
55 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Harris · 290 So. 2d 681 - State v. Paciera · 327 So. 2d 301 - State v. Nix
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"A showing of probable cause requires much less evidence than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As the term `probable cause' implies, the magistrate, and the officers securing his approval for the search, are dealing in probabilities. `These are not technical; they are factual and practical considerations of everyday life upon which reasonable and prudent men, not legal technicians, act.' Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949). Furthermore, a magistrate's determination of probable cause should be accorded great deference by a reviewing court. State v. Nix, 327 So.2d 301 (La.1975). The reviewing court must avoid the temptation to substitute its judgment for that of the magistrate and should merely determine whether there was a substantial basis for the magistrate's determination. United States v. Middleton, 599 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir.1979); State v. Sierra, 338 So.2d 609 (La.1976). (Footnote omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"As to the issue of whether the passage of time rendered the facts supporting probable cause so attenuated as to defeat the inference that the objects sought may still be found on the premises, that determination depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. State v. Gilbert, 354 So.2d 508 (La.1978) ; State v. Thompson, 354 So.2d 513 (La.1978) . Whether an object from its nature can be expected to be retained on the premises and whether the evidence indicates that the course of conduct is continuing are important factors to consider. See State v. Gilbert , above; State v. Loehr, 355 So.2d 925 (La.1978) ; State v. Armstead, 385 So.2d 241 (La.1980) ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.